All Roads Lead to Jerusalem logo All Roads Lead to Jerusalem

Decolonizing social sciences

  • Sitemap
  • Posts
  • Indic Categories
  • Colonialism
  • Secularism
  • Books
  • Videos
  • About
  • Contact
  1. Home
  2. All Posts
  3. Multiple meanings: puja, thondam—S.N. Balagangadhara

Multiple meanings: puja, thondam—S.N. Balagangadhara

Mar 1, 2011 Balagangadhara , puja , worship hipkapi

About the multiple meanings for the Puja of Ganesha. Of course, there is no one ‘meaning’ to this act either now, or before, or in the future, as far as Indians (and the Westerners) are concerned. But that is not being disputed. The dispute arises when some meaning is alleged to portray the ’experience’ of a culture, when all it does is distort and deny the experience it is said to portray. However, there is an interesting question here, which is best illustrated using a contrast. In the Catholic Mass, there are limits on what it could be said to mean to a believer. These limits are set by the Catholic theology and belief. (For instance, to a believer, it cannot mean celebrating the Devil.) The puja of Ganesha does not set any such limits to the person who does this puja. (But if someone comes and tells me that I cook sweets on Ganesha Chaturthi because it expresses my ‘subconscious’ desire for Oral Sex, I am justified in challenging this claim as an ’explanation’ of my cooking the sweets.) Here is the question: what is puja in the Indian traditions, if it does not have a particular meaning, and there are no limits on what it means? One thing is already clear: it cannot mean ‘worship’! These are the kind of questions I would like to ask; not what ‘interpretation’ one gives to some action or the other. The answer I give should be capable of being ’tested’ in the Indian culture. Then, I will have begun producing an ‘objective’ theory.

If you were to ask 100 knowledgeable Indians about the ’thondam’ of Ganesha, you are probably likely to get 50 different answers, all of which are ‘satisfactory’ in some sense or the other. From this situation, you can go one of the two ways. One is what appears to us as the more familiar way: which of the 50 answers is the right one? The second is to ask ourselves the questions: why do all these answers appear acceptable? What does this tell about what a question is and what answers are in the Indian traditions? In other words, we take the ‘facts’ that our cultures present us with as ‘problems’ that require solutions.

Why do we want to do this? It is because how we ‘understand’ our culture is thickly overlaid with what other cultures have told us about ourselves. Consequently, we misunderstand ourselves. We need to do research and yet more research in order to understand ourselves and the others.

Recent Posts

  • How to read Gita? Apr 28, 2024
  • Indian education system is a social parasite Apr 28, 2024
  • Accessing knowledge through past theories Apr 24, 2024
  • What happened in Ayodhya? Apr 3, 2024
  • Pudgala Jan 21, 2024

Categories

  • Balagangadhara311
  • Basics53
  • Published46
  • Indian Traditions38
  • Normative35
  • Colonial Consciousness34
  • Jakob34
  • Criticism33
  • Enlightenment29
  • Secularization28
  • Christianity24
  • Caste23
  • Translation20
  • Knowledge19
  • Religion17
  • Tolerance16
  • Real15
  • Stories15
  • Psychology14
  • Explanatorily Intelligible12
  • Concept(category)11
  • Experience11
  • Puja11
  • Corruption10
  • Secularism10
  • Social Sciences10
  • Adhoc9
  • History9
  • Ignorance9
  • Bullshit8
  • Immoral8
  • Law8
  • NRI8
  • Secular8
  • Action7
  • Colonialism7
  • Erudition7
  • Explication7
  • India-Forum7
  • Symbolism7
  • Belief6
  • God, Satan(Devil)6
  • Hinduism6
  • Sat(asat)6
  • Tradition6
  • Transcript6
  • Vibrancy6
  • Worship6
  • Edward Said5
  • Epw5
  • Orientalism5
  • Proselytization5
  • Rationality5
  • Reservations5
  • Terrorism5
  • Truth5
  • Buddha4
  • Dailyo4
  • Evolution4
  • Intentionality4
  • Interests4
  • Outlook4
  • Review4
  • Supererogation4
  • Swarjyamag4
  • Theory-Ladenness4
  • Willem4
  • World View4
  • Atheism3
  • Essentialism3
  • Indexical3
  • Petitio Principii3
  • Sarah3
  • Dialogues2
  • Gelders2
  • Language2
  • Morality2
  • Natural Sciences2
  • Practice2
  • Ritual2
  • Sulekha2
  • Westology2
  • Behaviorism1
  • Books1
  • Conscience1
  • Faith1
  • Islam1
  • Legislation1
  • Neutral1
  • Nietzsche1
  • Niticentral1
  • Philology1
  • Roundabout1
  • Sacred1
  • Uncategorized1

Tags

  • Wendy Doniger
  • Hipkapi
  • Rajiv Malhotra
  • Gita
  • Michael Witzel
  • Aristotle
  • Exclusivism
  • Exklusivismus
  • Inclusivism
  • Inklusivismus
  • Jeffrey Kripal
  • Jeffry Kripal
  • Paul Courtright
  • Paul Hacker
  • Rain Dance
  • Romila Thapar
  • Steve Farmer
  • Will Sweetman
  • Wittgenstein
  • Atman
← Is Rain dance superstitious?—Willem Derde Are Muslims ‘Mohammedans’? →

Related Posts

  • Puja and Worship Mar 2, 2011
  • God, Devil (Satan), and Polytheism Mar 2, 2011
  • Translation or Random Substitution: Worship and Puja Oct 16, 2017
  • Why study the Western culture? Mar 24, 2014
Powered by Hugo & Explore Theme.