All Roads Lead to Jerusalem logo All Roads Lead to Jerusalem

Decolonizing social sciences

  • Sitemap
  • Posts
  • Indic Categories
  • Colonialism
  • Secularism
  • Books
  • Videos
  • About
  • Contact
  1. Home
  2. All Posts
  3. Incoherence of Indian scholars on secularism

Incoherence of Indian scholars on secularism

Apr 6, 2011 Balagangadhara , secularism hipkapi

Sasheej Hegde in his EPW article says: “A theory of secularism in the sense of a theory about possessing the concept ‘secular’ is quite distinct from a theory about how the concept secular represents.”

It is downright incoherent. He obviously thinks that a theory about secularism (which is a political theory) is about ‘possessing the concept of the secular’ (which is a psychological theory about having concepts in general). The latter, he says, is different about a philosophical theory about how any concept ‘represents’. It is true, a political theory about secularism is different from a psychological theory about human beings acquire concepts and both of these are different from a philosophical theory about how any concept represents what it purports to represent.

This incoherence is the lot of most Indians when they discuss about secularism.

Recent Posts

  • How to read Gita? Apr 28, 2024
  • Indian education system is a social parasite Apr 28, 2024
  • Accessing knowledge through past theories Apr 24, 2024
  • What happened in Ayodhya? Apr 3, 2024
  • Pudgala Jan 21, 2024

Categories

  • Balagangadhara311
  • Basics53
  • Published46
  • Indian Traditions38
  • Normative35
  • Colonial Consciousness34
  • Jakob34
  • Criticism33
  • Enlightenment29
  • Secularization28
  • Christianity24
  • Caste23
  • Translation20
  • Knowledge19
  • Religion17
  • Tolerance16
  • Real15
  • Stories15
  • Psychology14
  • Explanatorily Intelligible12
  • Concept(category)11
  • Experience11
  • Puja11
  • Corruption10
  • Secularism10
  • Social Sciences10
  • Adhoc9
  • History9
  • Ignorance9
  • Bullshit8
  • Immoral8
  • Law8
  • NRI8
  • Secular8
  • Action7
  • Colonialism7
  • Erudition7
  • Explication7
  • India-Forum7
  • Symbolism7
  • Belief6
  • God, Satan(Devil)6
  • Hinduism6
  • Sat(asat)6
  • Tradition6
  • Transcript6
  • Vibrancy6
  • Worship6
  • Edward Said5
  • Epw5
  • Orientalism5
  • Proselytization5
  • Rationality5
  • Reservations5
  • Terrorism5
  • Truth5
  • Buddha4
  • Dailyo4
  • Evolution4
  • Intentionality4
  • Interests4
  • Outlook4
  • Review4
  • Supererogation4
  • Swarjyamag4
  • Theory-Ladenness4
  • Willem4
  • World View4
  • Atheism3
  • Essentialism3
  • Indexical3
  • Petitio Principii3
  • Sarah3
  • Dialogues2
  • Gelders2
  • Language2
  • Morality2
  • Natural Sciences2
  • Practice2
  • Ritual2
  • Sulekha2
  • Westology2
  • Behaviorism1
  • Books1
  • Conscience1
  • Faith1
  • Islam1
  • Legislation1
  • Neutral1
  • Nietzsche1
  • Niticentral1
  • Philology1
  • Roundabout1
  • Sacred1
  • Uncategorized1

Tags

  • Wendy Doniger
  • Hipkapi
  • Rajiv Malhotra
  • Gita
  • Michael Witzel
  • Aristotle
  • Exclusivism
  • Exklusivismus
  • Inclusivism
  • Inklusivismus
  • Jeffrey Kripal
  • Jeffry Kripal
  • Paul Courtright
  • Paul Hacker
  • Rain Dance
  • Romila Thapar
  • Steve Farmer
  • Will Sweetman
  • Wittgenstein
  • Atman
← Criticism: Are we living in barrenness? What exists in India, given ‘Hinduism’, ‘Buddhism’, etc. do not exist →

Related Posts

  • Is laukika-adhyatimika distinction same as secular-sacred distinction? Apr 4, 2011
  • Why Indian Secularists do not think but talk? Mar 23, 2011
  • Meanings and Historical Context: the arguments from Indian scholars –S.N.Balagangadhara Mar 4, 2011
  • Dark Hour of Secularism: Hindu Fundamentalism and Colonial Liberalism in India Jul 7, 2015
Powered by Hugo & Explore Theme.