All Roads Lead to Jerusalem logo All Roads Lead to Jerusalem

Decolonizing social sciences

  • Sitemap
  • Posts
  • Indic Categories
  • Colonialism
  • Secularism
  • Books
  • Videos
  • About
  • Contact
  1. Home
  2. All Posts
  3. Criticism: you are not using game theory

Criticism: you are not using game theory

Mar 2, 2011 Balagangadhara , criticism hipkapi

Is the model of games useful in understanding evolution of some aspect of society? If you use ‘games’ in a very, very general sense (viz. there are players, strategies, end-results, and such like), then it might. There is a flourishing branch of mathematics called ‘Game theory’ that has been used to study many things in nature and society: from the evolution of rules and norms to seeing evolution itself in Game-theoretic terms. I need to warn you that its notion of games is a technical one and involves two or more ‘players’, who follow certain strategies for ‘winning’ to which a certain pay-off is coupled. While it has uncovered certain interesting dilemmas in societies, I do not find it as fruitful as its practitioners claim.

Recent Posts

  • How to read Gita? Apr 28, 2024
  • Indian education system is a social parasite Apr 28, 2024
  • Accessing knowledge through past theories Apr 24, 2024
  • What happened in Ayodhya? Apr 3, 2024
  • Pudgala Jan 21, 2024

Categories

  • Balagangadhara311
  • Basics53
  • Published46
  • Indian Traditions38
  • Normative35
  • Colonial Consciousness34
  • Jakob34
  • Criticism33
  • Enlightenment29
  • Secularization28
  • Christianity24
  • Caste23
  • Translation20
  • Knowledge19
  • Religion17
  • Tolerance16
  • Real15
  • Stories15
  • Psychology14
  • Explanatorily Intelligible12
  • Concept(category)11
  • Experience11
  • Puja11
  • Corruption10
  • Secularism10
  • Social Sciences10
  • Adhoc9
  • History9
  • Ignorance9
  • Bullshit8
  • Immoral8
  • Law8
  • NRI8
  • Secular8
  • Action7
  • Colonialism7
  • Erudition7
  • Explication7
  • India-Forum7
  • Symbolism7
  • Belief6
  • God, Satan(Devil)6
  • Hinduism6
  • Sat(asat)6
  • Tradition6
  • Transcript6
  • Vibrancy6
  • Worship6
  • Edward Said5
  • Epw5
  • Orientalism5
  • Proselytization5
  • Rationality5
  • Reservations5
  • Terrorism5
  • Truth5
  • Buddha4
  • Dailyo4
  • Evolution4
  • Intentionality4
  • Interests4
  • Outlook4
  • Review4
  • Supererogation4
  • Swarjyamag4
  • Theory-Ladenness4
  • Willem4
  • World View4
  • Atheism3
  • Essentialism3
  • Indexical3
  • Petitio Principii3
  • Sarah3
  • Dialogues2
  • Gelders2
  • Language2
  • Morality2
  • Natural Sciences2
  • Practice2
  • Ritual2
  • Sulekha2
  • Westology2
  • Behaviorism1
  • Books1
  • Conscience1
  • Faith1
  • Islam1
  • Legislation1
  • Neutral1
  • Nietzsche1
  • Niticentral1
  • Philology1
  • Roundabout1
  • Sacred1
  • Uncategorized1

Tags

  • Wendy Doniger
  • Hipkapi
  • Rajiv Malhotra
  • Gita
  • Michael Witzel
  • Aristotle
  • Exclusivism
  • Exklusivismus
  • Inclusivism
  • Inklusivismus
  • Jeffrey Kripal
  • Jeffry Kripal
  • Paul Courtright
  • Paul Hacker
  • Rain Dance
  • Romila Thapar
  • Steve Farmer
  • Will Sweetman
  • Wittgenstein
  • Atman
← Criticism: you are not studying Ancient India! Criticism: one need to be Indian to study Indian culture →

Related Posts

  • Criticism: Are we living in barrenness? Apr 6, 2011
  • Family resemblances, language games, Wittgenstein, and debates on religion Apr 1, 2011
  • Why people resist to think critically? Mar 25, 2011
  • Existential Questions Mar 24, 2011
Powered by Hugo & Explore Theme.