All Roads Lead to Jerusalem logo All Roads Lead to Jerusalem

Decolonizing social sciences

  • Sitemap
  • Posts
  • Indic Categories
  • Colonialism
  • Secularism
  • Books
  • Videos
  • About
  • Contact
  1. Home
  2. All Posts
  3. Criticism: Nonsense

Criticism: Nonsense

Mar 3, 2011 Balagangadhara , criticism hipkapi

Regarding nonsense. I take it you mean that my claims are false or wrong. In that case, I would like to read your reasons. There is no point in simply saying something like that without telling which other theory of religion does better than mine. Even if there are problems in my theory, I claim that this is the best theory we have in the market place. If you think differently, I would like you to tell us the way in which any of the competitor theories in the market place does better. Of course, as a scientist, I do know (and accept) at a meta-level that all my claims are hypothetical and tentative. I very honestly hope to see and greet, before I die, a much better theory of religion than the one I am developing. Such a process will come into being, if people like you discuss the theory in a critical but rational way. It will not, if people continue nit-picking and come up with irrelevant criticisms.

Recent Posts

  • How to read Gita? Apr 28, 2024
  • Indian education system is a social parasite Apr 28, 2024
  • Accessing knowledge through past theories Apr 24, 2024
  • What happened in Ayodhya? Apr 3, 2024
  • Pudgala Jan 21, 2024

Categories

  • Balagangadhara311
  • Basics53
  • Published46
  • Indian Traditions38
  • Normative35
  • Colonial Consciousness34
  • Jakob34
  • Criticism33
  • Enlightenment29
  • Secularization28
  • Christianity24
  • Caste23
  • Translation20
  • Knowledge19
  • Religion17
  • Tolerance16
  • Real15
  • Stories15
  • Psychology14
  • Explanatorily Intelligible12
  • Concept(category)11
  • Experience11
  • Puja11
  • Corruption10
  • Secularism10
  • Social Sciences10
  • Adhoc9
  • History9
  • Ignorance9
  • Bullshit8
  • Immoral8
  • Law8
  • NRI8
  • Secular8
  • Action7
  • Colonialism7
  • Erudition7
  • Explication7
  • India-Forum7
  • Symbolism7
  • Belief6
  • God, Satan(Devil)6
  • Hinduism6
  • Sat(asat)6
  • Tradition6
  • Transcript6
  • Vibrancy6
  • Worship6
  • Edward Said5
  • Epw5
  • Orientalism5
  • Proselytization5
  • Rationality5
  • Reservations5
  • Terrorism5
  • Truth5
  • Buddha4
  • Dailyo4
  • Evolution4
  • Intentionality4
  • Interests4
  • Outlook4
  • Review4
  • Supererogation4
  • Swarjyamag4
  • Theory-Ladenness4
  • Willem4
  • World View4
  • Atheism3
  • Essentialism3
  • Indexical3
  • Petitio Principii3
  • Sarah3
  • Dialogues2
  • Gelders2
  • Language2
  • Morality2
  • Natural Sciences2
  • Practice2
  • Ritual2
  • Sulekha2
  • Westology2
  • Behaviorism1
  • Books1
  • Conscience1
  • Faith1
  • Islam1
  • Legislation1
  • Neutral1
  • Nietzsche1
  • Niticentral1
  • Philology1
  • Roundabout1
  • Sacred1
  • Uncategorized1

Tags

  • Wendy Doniger
  • Hipkapi
  • Rajiv Malhotra
  • Gita
  • Michael Witzel
  • Aristotle
  • Exclusivism
  • Exklusivismus
  • Inclusivism
  • Inklusivismus
  • Jeffrey Kripal
  • Jeffry Kripal
  • Paul Courtright
  • Paul Hacker
  • Rain Dance
  • Romila Thapar
  • Steve Farmer
  • Will Sweetman
  • Wittgenstein
  • Atman
← Logic of normative ethics: Immorality Criticism: Twisted arguments →

Related Posts

  • Criticism: Are we living in barrenness? Apr 6, 2011
  • Family resemblances, language games, Wittgenstein, and debates on religion Apr 1, 2011
  • Why people resist to think critically? Mar 25, 2011
  • Existential Questions Mar 24, 2011
Powered by Hugo & Explore Theme.